Religion, Ignorance, and Tribal Loyalty - What a recipe for disaster!

For the most part, I don't give a hoot about my neighbor's religion, save a small number of things:

1. What holidays does he/she celebrate, so that I can give them friendly greetings on those days?
2. Does the practice of that neighbor's religion interfere with my life?
3. Is my neighbor's practice of religion causing direct harm to others?

If a neighbor is Jewish, I might wish him/her a happy Chaunnakah.  If a neighbor is Muslim, I might wish him a happy end to fasting after Ramadan. But sometimes people of my own Christian faith can be the most perplexing.

- - - - - -

Recently, there has been a lot of press discussing the alleged sexual abuse by one of the Duggar sons upon several girls - including his sisters.  Normally, this would be a story confined to the back pages of most newspapers, save for one thing - the Duggar family has become extremely visible because of their "reality" TV show.

The Duggars are evangelical fundamentalists who have a very strict code of behavior - boys and girls must not touch each other (kissing, holding hands, etc.) until they are betrothed or married. This implies that there is a lot of sexual repression going on.  In one report that I heard (I can't remember where), the children did not know that the son's sexual touching was inappropriate behavior. And when discussed in their local church, a goodly many people as well didn't realize that this behavior was inappropriate. In short, the way to prevent sin, ignorance, had failed to protect a family from evil....

If we take a step back, and recall the story of Adam and Eve, the one commandment given to the two people was to NOT eat from the tree of knowledge. In short, ignorance was bliss. Gain useful knowledge, and one can see that life was not heavenly, but hellish instead.

In the case of the Duggars, the only way to prevent disaster was to promote ignorance. Any break in the pattern of their lives, and people would find out something was seriously wrong. To distract others from seeing this family for what it is, the Matriarch slandered the transgender community - saying that transgenders are out to molest young girls.  Do they not see the motes in their own family's eyes?  

- - - - - -

If the Duggars were a small group of crackpots, like the people from the Westboro Baptist Church, this would not be a problem. But we're seeing this this kind of transphobia, hatred of gays, and hypocrisy runs deep in the bible belt. In a recent interview on Fox News, one pastor was ranting that it was no one's affair about what the Duggars did - even when molestation took place. Dr. Drew stated that anyone with children (especially 19 of them) should supervise their kids well - and the evangelical pastor went nuts!  The pastor was defending a member of his tribe, no matter how much evil had to be covered up. Can you imagine what is going on in other evangelical households where ignorance is preached and sexuality is repressed instead of being dealt with in a healthy way?

- - - - - -

Right now, the GOP is beholden to a large number of crack pots like this family - who get the vote out, and keep the Red States glowing a bright red.  But how long can this last?  The mainstream party bosses know this is a problem, but don't know how to solve it. They are afraid of losing to a demographically superior Democratic party.  So they won't risk anything that would lose the Red States, in order to flip more "middle of the road" states from Blue to Red.

This wouldn't be so bad if the damage these people cause were limited to their own states. But they have taken an "opposition for the sake of opposition" approach to politics - they refuse to make trade offs with people on the other side of the political aisle.  (I'm not sure if I can say that the Democrats are much better. What I can say is that the GOP is inconsistent in their areas of hypocrisy, while the Democrats are consistent in their areas of hypocrisy.)

Although I am a registered Republican, I haven't voted their way in ages - there is a consistency in bills they'd enact if voted into power, and I don't want to see that happen. (I prefer the devil I know, to the one I don't.). Now that the public sees income and wealth distribution as a problem, the GOP is jumping on this cause - something the Democrats have talked about for ages. Both sides are BSing the public. But only one flip flops as quickly as the GOP.

- - - - - -

I fear what will happen if crackpots like the Duggars gain political power.  We already have one member of the Supreme Court who has hinted that he believes in short term creation. What would this do to Science and Mathematics education in this country?  We've already seen Texas consider the prophet Moses to be one of our "founding fathers".  What's next? How ignorant can we become?  How much further can we fall behind our global competition?  

Although I don't like the idea of a Republican Party who openly supports a Plutocracy, I am even more against a party who combines that with religious litmus testing. There were valid economic points being made by many in the GOP in their political discussions, and they were being lost because of this unholy arrangement with religious fundamentalists. To me, the one thing that has helped make this country great is the separation of church and state - allowing everyone to be free to practice their faith as they please - even the Duggars.  Take away that separation, and watch America relearn the lessons Europe learned hundreds of years ago. Do we want to go through that process ...again?  

The more things change, the more they stay the same - in the South

Years ago, scenes such as this were common through the states that rebelled against the Union in 1861. Although Slavery was eliminated by 1865, the South created "Jim Crow" and "Separate but Equal" as tools to keep Blacks disenfranchised. Making Blacks use separate facilities (if they existed) for basic needs (such as getting a drink of ice water, as in the photo above) was a way of telling Blacks that they were valued little more than cattle on the farm. Today, these signs are long gone. Yet, the South (with other conservative states) are creating a new class of third class citizen by use of laws that discriminate against a very small number of people - Transgenders. 

It shocked America when the former George Jorgensen came back to the United States in 1951 as Christine Jorgensen. She was looked on as a form of oddity then, as there were only a handful of people who had undergone a sex change operation. Even Louis Farrakhan (in his pre-Muslim Brotherhood days) wrote a song about her - "Is she is, or is she ain't?" Yet, I can't recall anyone trying to deny her the rights to go about as a woman in society. (I can't say whether she had an amended birth certificate or other ID that identified her as female, but she was treated as such by most people she met.)

However things have changed. We now know that transgenders are at least 1/3000th of our nation's population, and maybe more. And as more and more transgenders decide to live in the gender other than that assigned at birth, we're seeing conservative elements in society attempting to bring back obstacles that are intended to let transgenders know that they are considered not worthy of having basic rights.

The author of this blog entry (Wingnuts and the political machine) notes that the bigots are attacking basic human needs, such as the right of the transgenders to go to the bathroom. Since it doesn't make sense to provide separate facilities (there is no "Separate but Equal" requirement for transgenders) for such a small population, the laws that ban transgenders from using appropriate bathrooms mean that there is no place for these people to go.

Why does the sight of a transgender person worry a certain class of conservatives so much? I think that the idea of transgenders provide a proof that the gender binary that has been indoctrinated into some people since childhood is at risk. And they would rather destroy any facts that challenge their understanding of the world.  Could you imagine what these people would feel if they were to see one permanent exhibit at NYC's Museum of Sex? The exhibit I note has examples of animals which change their sex, animals which have both male and female sex organs, and animals that do not reproduce sexually. This certainly does not agree with the biblical account of creation.

- - - - - -

You'll notice that I started with an issue that affects a small percentage of the population. But it gets worse from there. America is a nation of immigrants. Yet, narrow minded people are "suggesting" that people change their names when they come to America to reduce the effort that the "natives" need to expend to learn their new neighbors' names. 

Time and time again, I see postings trying to stir up hatred of Islam from some of my more conservative friends. There is legitimate fear of extremists - these friends see evidence of what happens when radical Islamists get control of countries, and they are right to be worried. But they don't see that their imposition of a fundamentalist form of Christianity is almost as bad as what they fear. Yet, they do make some good points, when they note how the imposition of fundamentalist Islam has affected several countries.

 Iran - Before and After

 Egypt - Before and After

And this problem even infects a "Christian" country when a large number of fundamentalist Muslims immigrate there.....

The Netherlands -

Before and After

What I find interesting is that Christian fundamentalists who fear change can be just as extreme as Muslim fundamentalists. Both believe in forcing others to live their way - even if it means destroying anything which challenges their world view. And in the United States, it is our South that tends to put the most social restrictions on individual liberty. 

I hope that over time, it will become impossible to hold people down using religion and god as excuses to justify mistreatment of individuals. To see this day, forward thinking people will need to gain control of the media and broadcast their messages louder and more often than the opposition. As long as backward thinking people control the messages heard by the general public, we have a great risk of moving backward - as illustrated by the above pictures of Iran, Egypt and The Netherlands.  It will mean that we protect people that we don't really understand, such as Transgenders. But by protecting small minorities first, we prevent the back sliding that would put larger groups (such as Blacks) at greater risk....