It's been a while since I've posted in this journal, but I finally have something important to say.
Our special military operation against (read: war) Iran has been going on for several months now, and what do we have gotten for it? As I write this, we got 18 service members coming home in body bags, a depleted munitions stock, an aircraft carrier coming to port due to an under-supplied, emotionally exhausted crew, and hundreds of billions of dollars deeper in dept. We did not get regime change in Iran. We did not eliminate the potential nuclear threat Iran poses. And we did not vanquish our "enemy". Instead, we have shown that the US is a paper tiger, and that Iran has the power to shut off 20% of the world's oil supply.
Our president is known for taking action based on the voice of the last person who spoke to him. In this case, he was suckered into starting a war by the leader of Israel, a fellow crook in his own right. Previous presidents knew that a war with Iran could not be won, at least, not with the effort Americans were willing to put into the war. But, by starting this war, we have already lost it. But, if you ask our president, he'll say we're winning the war, and that the Strait of Hormuz is open for shipping. Yet, he'll act like a little child when someone asks him a question which holds him to account for his mistakes. His ego is so fragile, that by not admitting any of his failings, he is unable to learn from his mistakes. As a result, he keeps doubling down on his lies, and no one trusts him anymore. Yet, people are afraid of him due to his ability to rally members of his cult to attack his enemies.
America is now $40,000,000,000 in debt. For the first time in history, we are now paying more in debt service than we pay for defense. This can not last for long. This president would cut social spending in order to preserve our war machine. But what good would that do? We can't even defeat an enemy like Iran. Our military is not nimble. We still act as if we need to fight the wars of the 20th century, instead of those we need to fight now. Instead of retreating into 1940's military technology, as our president would do with our aircraft carriers, we should be at the forefront of 2020's military technology, as Ukraine has exhibited with its use of drone technology. I ask the question: why haven't we planned for the use of drones in warfare, given Ukraine's success of holding its own against Russia.
Unmanned vehicles (air, land, and sea) are the future of warfare, as they can enable militaries to fight wars while keeping their service members well behind the scenes in relative safety. For those near the front lines of battle, they can provide the tools for defense that older, more expensive military tools and weapons can not provide. Unmanned vehicles are cheaper and more effective than older military technology. They have allowed Ukraine, a nation without a navy, to defeat the Russian navy and make it an almost useless asset. Ukraine has developed a new way to fight wars, and all our president did was to say that Ukraine didn't hold any cards. And Ukraine has proven that it has a stronger hand than our president would admit by being able to attack Moscow with its drones. If anything, our war with Iran has shown that we hold a weaker hand than our current regime wants to admit.
Given the cost of proven drone technology vs. the cost of our overpriced military technology, I see a potential to kill several birds with one stone. First, we can no longer afford to enforce a "Pax Americana" as we did for the second half of the 20th century. So, let's wind it down to areas we can defend, and have other nations form healthy regional alliances for defense. Second, let's take she savings from winding down the "Pax Americana" and do three things with it: (a) develop drone technology with Ukraine and build up stockpiles which both countries can use, (b) plug up holes in our social safety net (especially in healthcare, and (c) pay down our national debt.
Iran has tactics which it is using that we are not matching. If propaganda is meant to modify public opinion, it is a cheap weapon in this internet age. While our president is posting AI Slop on his social media accounts, the Iranians are posting entertaining "Lego Stories" on their feeds. What's worse, as they are much more factual than the garbage our president is presenting as "Truth". Truth Social is anything but truth. Yet, Iran's videos cost almost nothing, spread further than our president's Truth Social posts, and contain more truth. Who do you think should be believed? Iran, a country who has said "Death to America" in the past, is no longer saying that (for now). They are directing their anger (rightfully) towards our President and his regime. What does this say for the legitimacy of the two contries' ruling elites?
The British empire fell because Britain couldn't afford to maintain it. As a result, it had to deal with decades of national decline. America is well on the same path to a similar national failure that could cripple us for generations. And yet, our president's incompetency has given us an opportunity if we are wise enough to seize it. Things are so FUBAR (F'd up beyond all recognition) that radical change may just be possible. Licensing Ukrainian drone technology might help our military become more nimble and cost effective. It may help America rebuild its industrial logistics, so that we can again build civilian products in the US, as we did with the aircraft and space industries. We can learn from the past, and choose to take a different path than those who preceded us.
The big question is: Will we learn the lessons of the past and make good choices. I'm hoping that America will follow the lead of a wise woman (Mae West) who said: "Whenever given the choice between two evils, I'll choose the one I haven't chosen before." It's time for something new, and even a bad choice of something new is better than the continued choices of something old we have been making as of late.
No comments:
Post a Comment