It never fails to surprise me about how little people retain from each day's news cycle. A few weeks ago, Obama's warming up towards Cuba was big news - and the "conservatives" were all chastising him for abandoning tactics which have been proven not to work. The same thing was done with Iran - and again, it was big news for a few days, and almost forgotten. We're seeing public opinion swayed by talking heads, in ways that George Orwell could only dream of....
Orwell, in "1984", presented a public speech where someone was ranting about one enemy, and in the middle of the speech the enemy changed. The former enemy was now a friend, and the former friend was now an enemy. Although this type of change isn't happening as fast as in Orwell's novel, we're already seeing this in our media. How many of us remember when our enemy was "godless" communism? And now our biggest trading partner is the People's Republic of China - governed by the Communist Party.
Although George Washington warned us against having any permanent entanglements, I don't think that he would believe how quickly the world changes in our lifetime. My father has seen Germany and Japan go from being friendly countries, to enemies, and back to being friends. And in my lifetime, I've seen the same happen with Vietnam, and am seeing it happen with Iran and Cuba.
- - - - - -
About 50 years ago, the city of Baltimore had its riots. And now, it had another round of riots. The problems are the same as they were 50 years ago - a general lack of economic opportunity. Americans will forget about this round of riots, as they have other important things in the news. But will we learn from them?
This time, we're seeing people around the world "armed" with cell phones (most of which contain the latest software) and active internet connections. Even in Iran's riots of a couple of years ago, the central government was unable to suppress all the news from getting out of the country. It couldn't suppress the news being passed along by its citizens. And the same thing happened here - the Baltimore Police could no longer cover up what triggered the riots - a "thug" whose rights were ignored by the police, and a death that couldn't be ignored.
Now, I've just used the word "thug" to describe this person. But is he as bad as the label I've attached to him? In an area as economically depressed as his section of Baltimore, over 56% of the adult male population is unemployed. Dr. Phil noted in an interview on Fox News that the people living in these poor sections of cities may have the same potential, but not the same opportunities, education, or inter-generational social pass-throughs. Was this person's rap sheet caused by a defect in this person's character, or was it caused by the environment he lived in?
- - - - - -
Two generations ago, we didn't need to worry about the problems of structural unemployment. Today, both people in the inner city and the suburbs are affected by these problems. The low end jobs which were stepping stones to greater opportunities no longer exist. Low value/High Labor cost manufacturing left the United States years ago. Computers have replaced humans in many tasks which would have provided work - the computer managed "help lines" we call are perfect examples of this. It is cheaper to have a human interface with a series of telephone menus than to reach a real, live, flesh and blood human. And society no longer provides the full and free education needed to fill the jobs of tomorrow.
Our college education system has been corrupted by government funding - instead of having our government expand access to college by building more colleges, we've seen our government increase the monies available to students in student loans. Simply adding more money to buy more education doesn't do much good - it only raised the nominal price of an education, making it much harder for both the poor and the middle class to afford college. And for those that got the student loans, they often now have onerous debt to repay, and are deferring having children. (I'm not even talking about those who took out predatory student loans issued by for-profit colleges that provided sub-standard educations - these students were screwed the day they entered school, and no one wants to fix this problem because the affected students come from the lower castes....) Since student debt can't be erased in bankruptcy, we now have a generation of Americans who will not be able to afford what will be needed from them in the future.
- - - - - -
It is very interesting is that the problems that once only afflicted the lower class are now affecting the middle class. Poverty used to be clustered in the inner city and in remote rural areas. Now, we're seeing newly poor people scattered through middle class neighborhoods. Houses are becoming derelict because of predatory lending combined with "Zombie Titles" that insulate banks from maintaining foreclosed properties - Banks are no longer foreclosing on many properties, making it impossible for borrowers to walk away from debt that they can no longer afford. Sadly, this may only be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what the banks will be doing next to preserve their power in society....
- - - - - -
Where will we end up? I don't know. I'm afraid for our future, as we're seeing the signs of America's upcoming collapse - and we, as a whole, have a lot of questions about our society's future that need to be asked and need to be answered. So far, all our leaders are doing is pandering to us and our fears - they do nothing to deal with the real problems. And this is a great danger that we all should fear....
The above is a collective image of the 6 Baltimore police officers who have been indicted for the homicide of Freddie Gray. Although they deserve a fair trial by an unbiased jury, it was interesting to see how political pressure can be used to redress some of the issues raised by some of the disenfranchised in society.
In the followup to the riots, we saw the Baltimore D.A. take an honest look at the evidence and had no choice but to call for an indictment. Gray was not belted into his seat for his own protection. The police van made 4 stops, not 1 before reaching its final destination. And, the knife once labeled as a switchblade was perfectly legal for Gray to possess. There was enough of a stench coming from the police involved, that even the D.A. couldn't avoid seeing an apparent abuse of police power.
Recently, Dr. Phil was on Fox News, and he slipped through a comment that the talking heads didn't notice. Although the kids in the poor neighborhoods may have the same potential as those in the better neighborhoods, environmental factors may be making it impossible for them to achieve this potential. Around 4:20 (or so) in the linked video, he noted that there are fewer opportunities available for these kids, that the school systems are very different for these kids than those in the affluent suburbs, that fewer resources are available for these kids, and that their parents do not have the "societal" skills to pass on to the next generation (as Dr. Phil puts it - "generational pass throughs").
- - - - - -
I have commented before about the warehousing of excess population in our nation's prisons. I have commented before on the economy of the drug trade, and how it is one of the last "industries" available to poor people with criminal records. I have commented about how people have been turned into 3rd class citizens, and denied the right to vote after serving time in prison. And I have commented before on unequal education in our country. But what happens when these factors are not properly addressed by society - Riots.
Why does this concern me? I don't live in the inner city; I live in the suburbs. The answer is simple. We are seeing the gradual breakdown of society from the bottom up. As the segment of society for whom enough opportunity does not exist grows, the more unrest there will be. When this segment swallows up much of what was once the middle class, I am not sure of how long our democratic republic will survive. I am very afraid of an authoritarian government taking the place of the flawed system we now have.
- - - - - -
When the above 6 police officers were indicted, I found it interesting that the people in the inner city were celebrating. Only time will tell if these officers are convicted. But is this a bone being thrown to the masses to keep them quiet? I am not sure. Years ago, we saw the O.J. Simpson trial on TV. It was captivating, if only because a black defendant had enough money and resources to put up a strong defense and win against a prosecution who had virtually unlimited resources. (It helped that there was a mixed race jury hearing the case, unlike the civil trial held in the L.A. Suburbs.) And at that time, one heard the same cheering among the Black segment of America's population as if "one of ours finally won!"
Law enforcement and criminal defense are two things that differ between the better off and the worse off in our society. In the more affluent communities, police treat residents (for the most part) with respect. If someone has to go to trial, that person generally can muster up enough resources to put up an adequate defense. This is not the case in poor communities, where the police are being used to control a disenfranchised population, by arbitrarily enforcing laws. Because the poor do not have adequate resources to defend themselves in court, there is extreme pressure to plead guilty for lesser prison time. And once out of prison, many poor people are now unemployable in the traditional economy. The drug trade becomes the only business open to these people, creating a vicious cycle of crime, poverty, and hopelessness.
- - - - - -
If one doesn't believe that there isn't an arbitrary standard of justice in this country, look at the latest video by Willie Nelson and Merle Haggard. In it, you'll see an action for which white people are rarely prosecuted, but for which black people are often prosecuted. Depending on the state this video was shot, the action would be legal, be a misdemeanor, or even be a felony.
As much as I love Willie Nelson's music, his use of cannabis illustrates the double standard of justice we have for black and white people in this country. The police have caught him and his entourage with cannabis - and he has never (from what I can tell) spent a day in jail. Can you say this about black people who have been arrested for possession/sale of the same substance?
To me, it's about time that we end the so-called "War on Drugs" and begin reinvesting in the inner city (and its residents). If we don't, are we willing to risk losing the freedoms we have left to a future authoritarian government, just to keep the disenfranchised under control?
This image makes it seem like the Baltimore police had the situation under control. However, given 4/27's news reporting on both Fox and MSNBC, this would be the furthest thing from the truth.
Normally, I lean left of center (based on today's politics) when interpreting affairs of the day.When it comes to riots, I have no problems with police being able to "shoot to kill". "Why?" you may ask... To me, the answer is simple - a riot is like a quick moving cancer. If it is not put down quickly, a community gets labeled as a bad place to make an investment. And, as a result, there is a loss of jobs which can force the community into an economic death.
Sadly, the fact that riots are taking place are indicative of a bigger social problem. We have an excess supply of people who are willing to work, but can not find gainful work. We have draconian laws (especially in regard to recreational substances) whose net effect is to disenfranchise large segments of the population, to warehouse them where they can't compete for jobs against a blissfully unaware but shrinking middle class, and to function as a tool to keep the lower economic classes in check.
If we look at the people in places like inner-city Baltimore, we see poor people who have poor educations, who will not be able to qualify for the jobs of tomorrow. They are frustrated, and do not have the ability to articulate their complaints against the larger society. Strangely enough, Fox had a reporter on the ground, interviewing one of the locals in front of the police, while MSNBC only had talking heads in the studio. But the message was clear, no matter which side of the political aisle you were on - the people in inner-city Baltimore are tired of living in conditions of little hope.
Watching the Fox interview of the unnamed Baltimore local, I noticed that the local mentioned that he just got out of prison on a trumped up drug charge, where the policeman planted the evidence that was used to convict him. In the past, I'd be inclined to think that this would be someone lying to save face. However, with these incidents (and others) on file, I'm not so certain we can put the word of the police above the average citizen any more:
Can we assume that the police are telling the truth? Not anymore. Yet, I believe that most of the police are getting a bad reputation from these "bad eggs", and from policies meant to detect crimes, even when no crimes have been committed.
Let's assume that this unnamed Baltimore local's statement is true. Then this is the tip of a very nasty iceberg. The people we've entrusted the duty to protect us have become part of the problem. In an article on where Baltimore's police went wrong, the author notes that dealing drugs is the only "industry" left in the inner city - and that our current drug laws are creating a police force that no longer polices neighborhoods to keep them safe, but instead, becomes a tool used to keep the poor and disenfranchised in line, and afraid to challenge the corrupt status quo.
Most policemen starting out are good people who are put under a lot of stress every day. However, our elected leaders set policies that often demand that the police meet quotas to show that crime is being reduced - and our police oblige them, out of fear that they will become victims of politics. Instead of being the trusted members of the community that one could count on to find out who is committing crimes, they become the distrusted outsiders responsible for keeping a sector of society out of public sight.
The big question is - how long will it be before the lower classes in American society rebel, as the French did in their 1784 revolution? I have no idea, but I hope that we can humanely fix the problem with the disenfranchised poor before they find a way to create a successful revolution of their own....
