Most people know that I lean a little bit left of today's center. By historical standards, I would have been a "Goldwater Republican." That is, I don't want the government legislating or enforcing morality, I don't want government needlessly interfering with business, and I want to limit the functions of government to those things it can do well. Sadly, the GOP has shifted to being a radical right wing party, one that looks to use government as a tool to quietly(?) reverse civil rights gains we've had over the last 60 years, one that looks to subsidize big business and billionaires at the expense of the working person, one that would use morality as an excuse to mistreat people whose looks and bahaviors differ from the fundamentalist White Christian Males who have historically had power in this country.
Our founding fathers understood that our nation was imperfect from the beginning. The Preabmble to The Declaration of Independance opens with:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
They knew that men are imperfect, and that governments derive their power from the people. It continues with:
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes.
But here lies the problem with the January 6th insurrection. The majority of the people were happy with our system of government. They were not happy with the actions of a government that no longer seemed to care about their needs. And they were ripe to become part of a cult which would enable a despot to overthrow the government while leaving a shadow of its structure intact.
The heart of the Washington, DC indictment of Donald Trump says that he was trying to overturn the electoral college election of Joseph Biden by interfering with the counting of the votes from the 50 states (plus DC). Assuming that Trump is convicted, he could be considered to have engaged in an insurrection against the United States, as some conservatives are now posing. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the constitution reads:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Since there is no chance that the Democrats in either house will vote to remove this disability, what would happen if lunatics in the GOP make Trump its 2024 presidential nomines? I pose that we could have a constitutional crisis if the following events occur:
- Trump wins the GOP nomination.
- Trump is convicted on January 6th issues (and maybe, Georgia RICO as well)
- Trump wins the Electoral College.
- Trump is ruled ineligible to serve as president during 2024 (case on rapid appeal to SCOTUS. SCOTUS says Trump ineligible.)
- Electoral college vote in chaos.
Since Trump would be ineligible to serve as president and the electoral college hasn't voted, what happens next? Some states' EC election laws would commit electors to vote for Trump/President & Mate/Vice President. Other states' laws might allow electors to vote for VP as President, but who gets VP vote? Even more confusing, we could have issues of "Faithless Electors." Could the election go to the house? Could we see a President of one party and a Vice President of the other? 28 years ago, Jeff Greenfield wrote a book about this problem, albeit in an era where we couldn't dream of a criminal being elected as president. Now, the electoral college risk is much worse, and people need to understand it.
Right now, we must start thinking of amending the us constitution to deal with the issue of what happens if a President/Vice President slate is elected by the 50 states (plus DC), and one member of the pair becomes ineligible to serve or unable to serve before the electoral college elects a President/Vice President slate, or before it takes office. As part of this amendment, we also need to fix the anomaly of what would happen if the presidential election goes to the House of Representatives, and the vice presidential election goes to the Senate. Currently, if this were to happen, we could see a President elected from one party, and a Vice President from the other. Maybe we need to make sure that both legislative houses agree on both the president and vice president as a pair before the president is considered selected.
No comments:
Post a Comment