Wednesday, October 1, 2025

Some modest proposals for Government Reform.

 


Image of Johnathan Swift


Years ago, Johnathan Swift made a "Modest Proposal" to deal with starving related to the Irish Potato Famine.  It was satirical and meant as social commentary.  However, my set of "Modest Proposals" are much more serious, and are related to changes we can make to the United States Constitution to promote a more responsive government that serves the will and needs of the people.

Proposed Constitutional Amendments:

28. Direct voting for President/Vice President.

The current method of electing presidents is imperfect, due in part to the unequal power of an individual citizen's vote.  A voter for "Candidate A" in California has 1/3  the voting power as that of a voter in Wyoming who votes for "Candidate B" due to the nature of allocating electors in the Electoral College.

What I propose is direct popular vote for the presidency/vice presidency.  If no candidate pairing gets an absolute majority, a follow-up vote between the top 2 candidates takes place 4 weeks a fter the general election.

29. Recall Voting.

All elected offices in the federal government will be subject to recall if any one of the following conditions are met:

A. For the president or vice president of the United States:

- If the legislatures of 60% of the states vote for recall.

- If  5% of citizens in each state, 60% of all states vote for recall.

If a  recall election is called for, this official must receive 50.1% affirmative votes to remain in office.  Otherwise, the next in line for presidential succession will take his place for a presidential recall.  In the case of a vice presidential recall, the office is declared vacant, and the president may nominate a new person for the vice presidency.

B. For Congressmen/women and Senators:

                   -  If 5% of the citizens of the congressional district (for congressmen) or 5% of the citizens
                      of the state (for senators)  vote for recall:

          If a recall election is called for, this official must recieve 50.1% affirmative votes to remain
          in office.  Otherwise, a new election for this office must be held within 60 days of recall.

30.  Term Limits for Federal Office Holders.

        Upon enaction of this amanement, all currently serving elected office holders are exempt from
        term limits for the offices they hold.  
  

        A. No president may serve more than 10 years in total as president.  

        B. Senators and Congressmen are limited to 18 years of service in each office.

        C. Supreme court justices will be limited to 18 years in office.  The longest serving justice on the
             court must retire on 2 year intervals, so that 2 justices will  be replaced in every presidential 
             term
.
  In cases of death, inability to serve, resignations, or other early departures from the
             court, the president may nominate a new justice to complete the former justice's 18 year term.

        D. The supreme court may have no less than 9 active members or no more than 13 active members/
             If the court is expanded beyond 9 members, a random selection of 9 members must be selected
             to hear any cases before it.

31. All federal office holders must adhere to a code of conduct enacted by congress, and be subject to
      the rule of law.

      A. The president is subject to all laws governing his actions.  No immunity may be given by any
           court for actions which have been prohibited by congress.  

      B.  No federal office holder may profit from inside knowledge of information gathered by the
            government.  All insider trading laws that currently apply to the citizenry must apply to all
            federal office holders.

      C.  All federal office holders are required to faithfully exercise the powers of their offices.  Failure
            to do so will subject them to penalties under the law (both civil and criminal) after leaving
            office (in the case of the
 president) or while in office (for all other office holders).

32. Repeal of the 11th amendment.  All states are subject to federal law, and may be sued by individuals
      in Federal courts.

33. All territories of the United States with populations larger than the smallest population state will
      be offered the right to vote for statehood every 10 years.  If the population of that territory elects to
      become a state, it will immediately be given the number of seats in the house and senate based on
      its population.

34. The apportionmet act of 1929 is to be repealed, with the formula for allocating representatives in the
      House of representatives based on the law which was supposed to be used for the 1920 census.  

35. Three senators to be elected by each state, with one seat open for election every 2 years.  

36. Election Reforms:

      A. No individual or corporation may contribute more than $5,000 to any election campaign,
           nor may any individual or campaign bundle its contributions to a campaign..  

      B. Campaign ads may only be shown within 2 months of any election.

      C. All votes to be tallied and totals reported within 3 days of any election.

      D. People running for office may only use verifiable facts in their campaign literature and
           speeches.  Deliberate lies will result in diswqualification for the office being saught.

37. Revocation of Presidential Pardons.

      On adoption of this amendment, The House and Senate may repeal a presidential pardon if
      both houses vote for a repeal with a 60% majority for a period of 6 months.  Afterwards,
      Any presidential pardon issued within the last 6 months of a president's term may be repealed
      in the first 6 months of the new president's term.

38. Neutrality in designing congressional districts.

      On adoption of this amendment, all states have 90 days to have a non-partisan committee to
      draw up new congressional districts for the following congressional election.  Failure to show
      that a state's congressional districts have not been gerrymandered may subject all people
      responsible for illegal district design for criminal punishment, which may include the death
      penalty.

I have kept this list as short as possible.  Ideally, I'd have been able to reinstate the "Fairness Doctrine" for all domestic news and opinion sources: Print Media, Broadcast Media, and Internet Sources from within the USA.  This would have prevented both left and right from distorting fact and presenting misinformation labeled as "news".  Additionally, I would have looked to put guardrails on the right to keep and bear arms, so that crazy people can't own guns.  However, I would want the public to retain the power to overthrow the government when the ballot box is ignored or corrupted.  Realistically, I don't expect anything like these changes to be adopted.  But they should serve to start an honest discussion of what is needed to be fixed, so that our nation lasts another 250 years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Clarence Darrow said it best.

 


"I have never killed any one, but I have read some obituary notices with great satisfaction."
Clarence Darrow


Recently, a right wing activist was murdered. No one important on the left is justifying his murder, but many are glad that this man is dead - he spewed hatred gussied up to sound acceptable to the younger generation. Although some of his points may have been valid (I never bothered to listen to this man's arguments), the general overtone of his messages have seduced people into believing the falsehoods spewed out by the right wing media. A quick look at the statistics will show that there are 3 times as many right wing assassinations than left wing assassinations in the USA. Yet, the right wing media conveniently ignores the murders committed by their loyalists and focuses on those from the left. Media bias in action to say the least.

I will never condone murder of any kind. Yet I wonder. If I could go back in time and erase the likes of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and others from history, would it be ethical to save millions of people by removing one from the earth? It's a simple case of the "Trolley Problem" on a larger scale. Most people would do nothing and let god (if there is one) decide. It is the rare person who would terminate the one person's life to save five lives. Yet, this is what many generals are tasked to do in wartime. So we have an ethical dilemma - what would you do? Sadly, there is no one right answer to problems like this. We can be glad that someone is dead. But we must prosecute the murderer to the best of our ability and get the guilty verdict he so rightly deserves.

- - - - - -

Right now, we are in a battle for our freedom. We can not use violence to achieve our ends, now that an authoritarian regime is in control of the federal government. If someone were to use terrorist tactics to attack the government, it would only result in an even more forceful crackdown on our personal liberties. So, what should we do?

It is said that people who chose not to study history are doomed to make the mistakes of the past But people who know history are able to see patterns of evil and use proven strategies to combat evil used by others in the past. Now is the time to study the tactics and strategies of Martin Luther King Jr. and Mohatma Gandhi. Although both leaders were asassinated, they achieved much of what they wanted in life. For Dr. King, he helped America realize that equal rights for all must become part of America's DNA. For Gandhi, it was the liberation if India from British rule.



I can still remember this man who stood in front of a row of Chinese tanks. What would happen if more of us were to stand in front of our president's goons and capture them on video as they break the law and attack innocent people? We already have seen his goons sink a Quebecers' boat on Lake Ticonderoga (on the small Canadian part of the lake) claiming he was in American waters. We have seen his goons sink a Venezualan boat with the false claim they were smuggling drugs into America. And to make things worse, the regime has deported American citizens, all in its attempts to "Make America White Again."

What can we do to short curcuit our president's evil actions? The only answer lies in non violent actions. Blockading ICE vehicles when they are harassing people is one thing to do. Video recording their illegal actions and sending it to the media (YouTube.com, Print Media, and Broadcast media) is an essential way to expose their crimes. There are many more things that one can do non violently. Any form of non violent resistance is essential. One should read how Dr. King and Gandhi achieved their goals, and use their methods.

Hopefully, we're not too late to stop this slide to authoritarianism....